Follow me on TwitterRSS Feeds
Is the iPhone 4 really defective or is it just AT&T?
When Rogers launched the iPhone 3G in July of 2008 their network must have been beaten to a pulp. They were the only network in Canada with iPhone for over a year, and until Bell and Telus launched their HSPA+ network in late 2009, Rogers seemed poised for a network over-extension. Recently Toronto saw Rogers’ network crack under the weight of the Pride Parade and a million visitors descending on the downtown core. It was not a good day for the network, and I have no doubt that Americans feel similarly perturbed on a daily basis when waking with AT&T’s spotty service.
But where we’ve heard the most chatter from iPhone 4 users about reception problems is in the US. A country with a network problem as it stands. Rogers rarely has signal degradation on their 3G network, and it will be interesting to see how the carrier handles the extra load when thousands of people inevitably sign up new contracts for the iPhone 4.
Suffice it to say, the antenna design was not an afterthought. If AT&T had a better network with a more pervasive 3G signal, this would be a non-issue. Merely covering the antenna does not always end in dropped calls and signal degradation, but when the signal is already low, it may lower it to a breaking point. There is a distinct difference between a design flaw and a co-dependance problem. Apple relies on its carriers to supply the data routing and signal availability. AT&T may have over-promised when they renegotiated with Apple to continue their exclusivity contract. No one really knows at this point. What we do know is that Apple is taking a lot of heat for this problem, and they may not be the right giant corporation to be pointing fingers at.
Then again, maybe they are.
As of today, the share price has taken quite a beating, losing about $9 billion in market share. That is peanuts in the scheme if things for Apple, but try to remember the last time the company was in hot water for one of their products? Doesn’t happen too often. I am no fanboy, and I hope the company learns a lot of lessons from this debacle, but let’s be clear here. A lot of engineers have claimed that the antenna, when receiving a strong signal, is actually much better than any previous iPhones. This is a fact. The fiction is the “improvements” AT&T seems to be making to their network.
Facts? Facts don’t sell phones.
Print article | This entry was posted by GuruDaniel on July 13, 2024 at 4:30 pm, and is filed under Editorials, Rogers Wireless. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
about 1 month ago
I can not put all of my blame on AT&T in this situation, because for starters, the whole “you can't hold the iPhone 4 like that” issue is Apple's problem, not AT&T's who's to say that putting the iPhone 4 on Verizon's network makes the phone holding problem any better? (Any Bold9650 VZW owners? lets talk about the “you cant charge your phone and talk at the same time” problem).
Also, apple had to have known that they could not flub anything regarding reception due to the problems they've had in highly iphone saturated areas of the US. This is apple not having all their ducks in a row. We all knew about AT&T's service. Apple new about AT&T's service. I don't think you should be placing all of the blame on AT&T here, because Apple knew what they were getting into. Thus why Apple AND AT&T are getting sued.
about 1 month ago
Did you see the new “silent” rumor going around now?
about 1 month ago
excuse me? “silent” rumor? this gets worse huh..
about 1 month ago
Check the latest.
about 1 month ago
that being said. i still say yes the service for the iphone is still kind of awful, but I can't put my hat into the blame AT&T boat. Apple KNEW the service was bad. You would think that with their 4th rendition of the iphone they would have made an effort to try and make things a little better for iphone users. But instead, DeathGripGate appears. I'm incredibly disappointed.
a lot of people say that the iPhone would be such a better idea on Verizon, but no. I would stick my neck out to say that the iPhone would probably cripple Verizon's network also.
about 1 month ago
I can not put all of my blame on AT&T in this situation, because for starters, the whole “you can't hold the iPhone 4 like that” issue is Apple's problem, not AT&T's who's to say that putting the iPhone 4 on Verizon's network makes the phone holding problem any better? (Any Bold9650 VZW owners? lets talk about the “you cant charge your phone and talk at the same time” problem).
Also, apple had to have known that they could not flub anything regarding reception due to the problems they've had in highly iphone saturated areas of the US. This is apple not having all their ducks in a row. We all knew about AT&T's service. Apple new about AT&T's service. I don't think you should be placing all of the blame on AT&T here, because Apple knew what they were getting into. Thus why Apple AND AT&T are getting sued.
about 1 month ago
Did you see the new “silent” rumor going around now?
about 1 month ago
excuse me? “silent” rumor? this gets worse huh..
about 1 month ago
Check the latest.
about 1 month ago
that being said. i still say yes the service for the iphone is still kind of awful, but I can't put my hat into the blame AT&T boat. Apple KNEW the service was bad. You would think that with their 4th rendition of the iphone they would have made an effort to try and make things a little better for iphone users. But instead, DeathGripGate appears. I'm incredibly disappointed.
a lot of people say that the iPhone would be such a better idea on Verizon, but no. I would stick my neck out to say that the iPhone would probably cripple Verizon's network also.