ARTICLES:

In Retrospect… (expletive removed) YOU!

POSTED BY: | Follow Me

July 27, 2024

CLICK HERE TO COMMENT (8)
Tweet

Last night, I wrote a little rant regarding the iPhone 4. It was an opinion piece entitled Why I Won’t Buy the iPhone 4 in Canada. It was not meant to be an inflammatory piece, but a few minutes after publishing, CellGuru started BBMing me about the “backlash” the post was receiving on Twitter and in the comments. I was busy sitting on the patio with a cup of coffee, reading the paper, so the news was kind of startling. In earnest, after months of publishing editorials on this site, it was the first time there has been any reaction to one of my pieces. A slow smirk appeared on my face. I can’t say I was displeased.

You see, most people don’t like seeing the words “Fuck Apple,” anywhere. Apple is a brand to which people are sensitive, even protective. Had I said, “Fuck Google,” I don’t think the reaction would have been as strong. Regardless, it was an editorial decision to begin the piece with the word “Fuck,” and, in the so-called professional blogging business, this is a no-no. Indeed, it’s considered unprofessional. So I re-read the piece. Garnering the reaction I did, I expected to be surprised at the vitriolic hatred I spewed against the most popular technology company in the world, but alas, it was only those two lines that really seemed out of place.

One of the comments on Twitter noted not that the article was in bad taste, but after reading it directly after the post What Do You Want From Us? seemed almost ironic. We are trying to increase our scope, attract more readers, and, indeed, become the “professional” cell phone news and reviews site that so many people try, and fail to, attain. But in the twenty minutes of fierce Twitter debate and constructive commenting on the post itself, I saw my Twitter followers almost double. I admitted to one of the more skeptical commenters that, indeed, we have to try and set ourselves apart. Sometimes being blasphemous just works. Sometimes it doesn’t. But we need traffic, just like any other site. And I don’t think beginning an editorial with “Fuck Apple,” ruins my editorial integrity. Especially if you read it in the context of the rest of the article. Some may disagree; some may never return to the site. But I achieved my goal of spurring debate, even if the debate itself was not about buying an iPhone 4 in Canada, but merely about the minutiae of professional blogging.

So, to anyone I offended, I apologize. But I won’t take the article down, nor remove the opening two lines. The piece, in its rushed, rant-like glory stands on its own. It was not an especially good piece; I doubt I’ll re-read it in a year and be proud of the writing quality, nor of the argument espoused. But it served its purpose, and that’s really all writers can hope to achieve. We have to take the hits as they come, stand by our work, and learn from the criticism. I certainly have. I appreciate the comments, the insults, the constructive remarks.

I really do this because it’s fun, and when it is no longer fun, like so many of our generation, I’ll probably find something else that is. It’s the genuinely unique existential crisis of our times. The internet affords so much freedom, since we get to hide behind these aliases and personae. But when I write, I do so in my own voice, with the experiences that have brought me to this point. As long as I continue to do that, I will be proud of my work, and I hope the same can be said for whatever you do, on- or offline.

  • michaelwpg

    Well said, and I tip my hat to you for writing the post. I may not have agreed with your writing style, but I respect the fact that you defend it. My only point yesterday was that while you served a purpose in the short term, growing this site is a long-range goal, which isn’t served by the use of shock. Yes, you generated “buzz” and discussion, but that will only take you so far.

    Take that as you will, it’s only one man’s opinion. I will continue to read what I find interesting, wherever I may find it. If you want to have this particular reader become a regular, it would take nothing more than what you are already doing. Just keep in mind there are readers out there that can tell when they are being pulled in by “gimmicks” and “shock” and will come back for discussion and thought instead.

    michaelwpg

  • Guest

    Humble pie? This article stands as an ego-based defense for an over-stated, sub-quality rant that you wrote because… it was fun? You had to fulfill a quota? You were bored?
    Regardless of the ‘why’, this conditional apology can’t be taken seriously if you are backing it up with the fact that you doubled your twitter following, or increased hits on the site, for which you are definitely not sorry.

    I am not here to bash your ‘fuck Apple’ approach, nor am I trying to put you down as an individual writer; we are all entitled to our opinions.
    With that being said, if you are going to go as far as apologizing, then mean it wholly. If you don’t, then skip the apology and stand your ground, as per your implied intention.
    It would be wise to note that just because YOU can appreciate the insults along with the constructive criticisms and comments, you shouldn’t assume that WE want to be insulted in turn by an empty apology titled (expletive removed) you.
    Figure out who you are, and more importantly who we are, before you write to us.

  • http://twitter.com/JasBanwait Jas

    buhahaha why did you write a follow up? You are more than qualified to have an opinion! Don’t take it back D!

  • michaelwpg

    Well said, and I tip my hat to you for writing the post. I may not have agreed with your writing style, but I respect the fact that you defend it. My only point yesterday was that while you served a purpose in the short term, growing this site is a long-range goal, which isn't served by the use of shock. Yes, you generated “buzz” and discussion, but that will only take you so far.

    Take that as you will, it's only one man's opinion. I will continue to read what I find interesting, wherever I may find it. If you want to have this particular reader become a regular, it would take nothing more than what you are already doing. Just keep in mind there are readers out there that can tell when they are being pulled in by “gimmicks” and “shock” and will come back for discussion and thought instead.

    michaelwpg

  • Amanda D

    I guess its a thin line between speaking your mind, and trying to be gimmicky. I don’t think you intentionally wrote your why I’m not buying apple post so close to asking what you wanted from readers, but I can see how people connected the two together.

    I think this is a “your damned if you do, your damned if you dont” situation.

    but i didnt mind the post, myself. :D

  • Guest

    Humble pie? This article stands as an ego-based defense for an over-stated, sub-quality rant that you wrote because… it was fun? You had to fulfill a quota? You were bored?
    Regardless of the 'why', this conditional apology can't be taken seriously if you are backing it up with the fact that you doubled your twitter following, or increased hits on the site, for which you are definitely not sorry.

    I am not here to bash your 'fuck Apple' approach, nor am I trying to put you down as an individual writer; we are all entitled to our opinions.
    With that being said, if you are going to go as far as apologizing, then mean it wholly. If you don't, then skip the apology and stand your ground, as per your implied intention.
    It would be wise to note that just because YOU can appreciate the insults along with the constructive criticisms and comments, you shouldn't assume that WE want to be insulted in turn by an empty apology titled (expletive removed) you.
    Figure out who you are, and more importantly who we are, before you write to us.

  • http://twitter.com/JasBanwait Jas

    buhahaha why did you write a follow up? You are more than qualified to have an opinion! Don't take it back D!

  • Amanda D

    I guess its a thin line between speaking your mind, and trying to be gimmicky. I don't think you intentionally wrote your why I'm not buying apple post so close to asking what you wanted from readers, but I can see how people connected the two together.

    I think this is a “your damned if you do, your damned if you dont” situation.

    but i didnt mind the post, myself. :D

blog comments powered by Disqus


Flow 93.5



The Phone Fixer

The Phone Fixer


FEATURED STORIES:

BEST PHONES:

What's the wagjag

TheCellularGuru's choice Twitter App for iPhone

CONTACT US SHOP TWITTER PRIVACY POLICY © Copyright 2010 | All rights reserved | The Cellular Guru Inc.