Is AT&T changing for the better? I already live in a metro area, where AT&T thrives, and I rarely take issue. I do acknowledge that this phenomenon is rare, however. Before I’m thrown in an asylum, let me state my case.

Network stability investment

AT&T is finally spending money on their network. They have admitted to problems in specific areas, like New York, and are working towards improving those zones. Stability is now an active goal. The previous chart aptly describes what AT&T is working for.

Getting every ounce of speed from 3G

3G speed enhancements are coming as fast as they can. With Sprint’s 4G already established, Verizon’s looming LTE plans and T-Mobile’s HSDPA rollout coming. AT&T has a ton of stiff competiton hitting hard and fast. Their complacency had always been annoying to us. Somewhat recently, backend improvements have been made to the network giving capability for a faster network, but nothing practical yet.

Microcells

For those with poor service where they need it most (at home), a microcell (basically a small, personal cell tower) can be connected to an Internet connection to extend AT&T’s network within your home. This concept of “paying to fix their network” is common, but it is a solution. AT&T is trying to be helpful, to bide time while other improvements can be made. Even with other carriers, it’s probable that one gets decent to great service everywhere except where they live. Why not patch this group up?

Application Restrictions

Finally, AT&T has severely relaxed their policies on app restrictions. Slingbox can stream TV, Skype can make calls (in theory, the app hasn’t been updated), heck, Skype can completely replace a phone line with the new 4.0 stuff.

I’d like to see enhancements made on roads between big cities, but haven’t seen any plans for that. However, with the abolishment of draconian practices an actual investment in network stability and speed… Maybe we actually can, “Rethink Possible.”